You see social science discourse doesn’t think people think. So Lazarus wants the thought of politics to stand on its own, outside a discourse grasping for the objective in social and political relations. First, we need to know that Lazarus hates all these social science dweebs and their objective total science of the social.
But what about (2)? What’s going on with this ‘of’ (there’s a real philosophy question if ever there was one). Much of Lazarus’ work returns to this phrase. We have already heard and will hear plenty about (1). Right at the heart of Lazarus’ work are what is fearsomely called ‘the two statements’. I’ve boiled it down to its three spiciest and most important components below. In order to see that politics is about people’s thought Lazarus erects a complex yet fascinating system.
Lazarus definition organizational model free#
Political science, you see, is the gathering of different methodological tools from disciplines obsessed with externalities and applying them to the one domain in which people free themselves from externalities. He asks what is the “thought of politics” and how you can “think politics.” It turns out if you want to think politics properly you need to disentangle it from other disciplines: economics, history and especially sociology. He’s also a pal of the first guy to ever experience an event – Alain Badiou – and they founded L’ Organisation Politique (literally ‘the political organization’) in 1985.įor Lazarus politics is really about the fact that people think.
Lazarus definition organizational model full#
Except he hates all of those disciplines and thinks they’re full of little shits. Lazarus is a French political theorist, anthropologist and sociologist. In the tradition of one of the greatest philosophy posts of all time – ‘ Who the Fuck is Jacques Rancière? ’ – I proudly present ‘Who the Fuck is Sylvain Lazarus?’ First as tragedy, then as farce. This, naturally, might lead to the following questions: who the fuck is Sylvain Lazarus? and why should I read him? Aren’t we all a bit tired of French guys with theoretical systems? Well, if you want an answer to these questions you should read on. In recent years a handful of terminally online sickos – myself included -have begun reading Lazarus. But what if there was a third, secret, option?Įnter: Sylvain Lazarus. Either failure is terminal (‘whoops, all ideology, didn’t realize absolute spirit this time!’), or it’s time to become a liberal. Apart from Walter Benjamin, whose philosophy mostly consists of poking around in revolutionary rubble with a stick, radical theory doesn’t always do a good job of thinking about this. Ever feel like left wing politics doesn’t go anywhere? Ever feel like things get exciting for a bit then dissipate? Ever feel like you are living in the ruins of a utopic dream where all is left are the worn and empty halls of a once great cathedral? If so you probably play too much Dark Souls, but also suffer from left wing melancholy.
0 kommentar(er)
